Tardation: a manufactured and artificially installed psychological malady emulating an addicted state of life where irrational political beliefs are deliberately sublimated into a life as the working counterbalance for the equally deliberate creation of a dysfunctional psychology within the victim.
With another federal election cycle bearing down on America now is a good time to return to this series. After all, from the get-go the concept of 'Tardation has been that it is a very deliberate and generations long effort, an effort crafted by ethically challenged members of the mental health profession working the will of amoral political power players who always desire (and apparently have acquired!) a reliable mechanism to enforce their will on the thought processes of the electorate that empowers them.
Essentially 'Tardation resolves as an attack on democratic self rule, a weapon of Covert Cultural Warfare attacking freedom where true freedom begins: between the ears of the electorate.
Beyond the insult to Democracy, attempting social control on such a scale is a very dangerous thing, it really is. The long term collateral damages such a weapon might cause in the fabric of society are both massive and beyond accurately predicting. Even with the most dystopian efforts of modern digital technology no weapon of covert cultural warfare can be targeted accurately enough to not produce deep and lasting damages well beyond the original intent of the weapon. The diluted and distorted forms of the weapon that will inevitably spread friend to friend, pastor to flock, professor to class and, most critically, parent to child set this much closer to fact than assertion.
Just how bad is the situation? From all evidence floating my 'best guess' is that between five and eight percent of the current population has been exposed to, and is heavily influenced approaching functionally controlled by, the mechanisms of 'tardation. Where that is a best guess number it is not a WAG (wild ass guess) number.
Those who know no more social statistics than I do know it is not likely to have been an accident when the good old bell curve… that thirty years ago represented a normal distribution of political attitudes and orientations … now shows the perfectly symmetrical polarization seen on the American political scene. The chances for such polarization to accidentally remain so close to balance are approaching zero.
If the entire curve (median value) shifted one way or another along the axis of that attitude I'd say it was a naturally occurring phenomenon… but to accidentally hold such a balance while increasing the intensity of the extremes? Kurtosis like that is not very likely to be accidental, not at all. That five to eight guess is a thumb against the horizon estimate (I've not run the numbers, if you've the ability please feel free to improve my accuracy) of how many individuals would be needed to produce what is seen.
No, the evidence indicates the work of an external force impacting on the system, and more… use of that force has to be equally available to the leadership representing BOTH polarities for their competition to be stalemated to the point of such a balance enduring for the length of time observed! The fact of the endurance of the situation is solid circumstantial evidence that the force does not originate from within the system. If one side or the other had originated that force their "first move" advantage would have broken the balance some time ago and the situation, the polarization, would now be reversing back towards a normal, even if heavily shifted, distribution.