Saturday, June 21, 2014

Sitting in...

Sitting in: to observe what you’re not really a part of, to play with a band not your own.  A lot of things are sitting in when you get right down to it, in the most technical sense of the thing a whole lot of modern entertainments qualify.  I listened to a radio show this morning hosted by two ladies who, it would seem, are members of slightly different facets of the Native American pagan community speaking out to others whose beliefs don’t descend from the tent of Abraham.  The content of their talk covered a variety of subjects where there might be common ground between them.  The soon to arrive solstice commonly marks a time for celebrations and rituals in many belief structures, it seemed an appropriate time to sit in as it were and hear what they had to say. 

Just for references sake, I am an ex-patriot Mormon who does not really subscribe to any of the formalized belief structures but rather simply acknowledge that there is a consciousness beyond that known to the humans.  I am, in simplest terms, simply a deist. There is an entity known to humanity through the ages as God, a self aware immortal thought force that intersects with our reality as a single omniscient and consummately benign being to whom I offer my allegiance in the common cause of survival as self.  Since this entity abides in realms beyond the limitations I perceive concerning my own thought and perception it then follows there is a valid possibility for a progression of other points of that thought force structured in varying degrees of complexity and motive which may well exist in part or in total beyond the limits of my direct perception. For me matters of a spiritual nature resolve to an ever more delicate quest to determine an answer to a most simple, and in that simplicity exceedingly deep, question: could this be true?

There is no doubt in my mind that whatever might be revealed concerning the literal and absolute truth of what exists in the realms of the spirit it is a true statement that humanity uses the thought of the spiritual as a screen against which it projects its’ perceptions of itself.  The personalities seen in the interactions of the various Gods and Goddesses one with another, one or the other with the humans, the totems and talismans, the rituals and the ceremonies, all of these things are clearly of human construction.  They are, to borrow a concept from Dr. Asimov’s awesome work of imagination The Foundation Trilogy, variables defined within the algebra of humanity  that mankind uses trying to reduce the equation of self  into some meaningful and useful form.  I am not belittling these efforts, far from it.  Each system is a branching of mankind’s efforts to understand, the history of the peoples and cultures who embrace each such effort a test platform for discerning any truth carried within that structure, for as it is said several places in the Bible: “By their fruit you will know them...”

No matter the (meta)physics involved there is a primal polarity involved with all changes to a life, and for my purposes that is by far the more critical understanding.  Regardless of the mechanisms involved all things show the ethical polarity of motive.  Yes, I did, I just paired the word ethics from the humanities with the word polarity from the sciences.  Sue me, it’s a valid concept the ladies also touched on in a most interesting, and actually rather optimistic, manner. 

Their approach to the thought involved the Native American meaning to the word “medicine.”  To the world of science medicine is an external thing brought to bear against some affliction, some disease, while if I understood correctly (no promises, just best effort) to the Native American traditions the word “medicine” also includes influencing internal perceptions, attitudes, designed to effect the psychology of the soul.  The concept is fully valid, science is documenting ever more evidence that the deep levels of psychology, the deep levels of conflict induced stress do indeed play major to massive roles in the overall health of an individual.  Most likely the Medicine Man of the old ways actually understood this before the Medicine Man of the modern had a clue.  Modern medicine is very powerful, and yet the medicine of the old ways has the potential for it to be needed far less often than is commonly seen. 


What the ladies said concerning “medicine” is that it will impact health for seven generations.  This factoid of their beliefs caught my ear, for I’d always associated the number seven to the generations, to be specific I’d (mis)remembered the Bible verses concerning the sins of the father would reach out even to seven generations.  But no, when I looked up the verses they all said four generations.  I find it a strange coincidence that my error equaled their belief.  That “medicine” in their sense has a seven generation range while the sins that most likely gave rise to the need for such medicine are reported as only impacting four?  Hmmm.... an interesting difference, that one is.  It implies that at the deepest levels the wholesome will out endure the profane, and I find that a fine thought indeed.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Sister...


GET YOUR THUMB OUTA THE WAY OF THAT SLIDE!!!

Saturday, June 14, 2014

Filler out of the can...


The Test Question:
As thoroughly as possible, explain Hume's argument for being skeptical of the idea that all good humans or dogs for that matter go to Heaven. In expressing this argument of Hume's, you will need to explain his philosophical perspective with respect to human knowledge and understanding as clearly and completely as you can. (Hint*, if you think you can do this well without explaining how Hume thinks of causality then you are the only one between us who thinks you can). Provide examples from the text and be sure to express what you think are the strengths and weaknesses of his argument(s).

To speak to the subject of “going to Heaven” from the perspective of David Hume’s philosophy is, in my opinion, to sacrifice the ultimately human qualities of hope and dignity on the alter of a logic which places no value on either, an ironic and futile sacrifice of the very sort the consummately skeptical Hume would likely point to as solid reason to not build alters of any sort.  Be that as it may, the toxic task at hand is to explain Hume’s philosophy while using it to construct an argument he might have used to introduce the greatest possible degree of doubt into anyone holding a belief in a post mortem awareness spent in a state of consummate peace and satisfaction, what is commonly called Heaven, as reward for the effort of a mortal life lived to any code of ethics more demanding than the approval of one’s fellows concerning some expediency of the moment.
To approach explaining Hume’s skepticism concerning any human going to heaven, or even the existence of heaven and all thought associated, one must first frame in an understanding of how the boundaries and limitations Hume enforced on his own thought, the often rigid and mechanistic logic by which he defined human existence, would impact on such concepts.

Monday, June 9, 2014

Distracted...


Just in case you're like me, and really want a why to go with the what.  When you need a reason for something that reason doesn't need to be something real as long as it is something that makes it worth doing.

Thursday, June 5, 2014

The Coldest Master of them all...

I am a capitalist, and yet I offer you this thought concerning wealth: wealth is a dangerous ambition, for wealth is a predator that all but destroys all who embrace it as their life’s desire... understand the true nature of wealth and you will understand the motives of those who have most repressed and misused humanity across the eons.  Wealth does not free anyone, not really, for wealth is a concept based on the deepest of insecurities.  To have surplus resources is to have security, and in security the freedom to look beyond the superficial, but that is not wealth.  Wealth is a master hard and cold and conniving, heartless and cruel, wealth is the comparison of one person as of greater worth than another measured against the narrowest of standards.  Wealth thrives not on creating the surplus resources that enable freedom but rather by rationing who has access to any resources at all, a barter system where the most primal elements of the common humanity are the expendable elements of commerce.  Be wary of wealth and guard well your soul, for nothing, not nation nor race, not religion nor culture nor gender will protect anyone from the consequences of the attitudes and ambitions that wealth demands of those it takes for its’ own.

Monday, June 2, 2014

In the Shadow of Mata Hari =or= A Very Ugly Suspicion

A few years ago I wrote a post called The Ghosts of Gomorrah that spoke of the “perversion in uniform” revealed by the Abu Graib incident during the occupation of Iraq.  I fell into conversation with a couple of kids the other day (well, not really kids, just folks a lot younger than myself) who put that thought back on the horizon from a different perspective, a different line of approach, but still, the same thought I’ve never felt quite full completed.

I’ve said it several times before, I’m gonna say it again:  only an idiot assumes the buoyancy of perversion in the ocean of humanity is the same as the buoyancy of ice floating in salt water.  Some things simply do not float at the surface, they find a common density well below the surface and are never seen unless some unusual force causes an upwelling, a shift in the relative densities.  When you synchronize the analogies war tends to stir the deep waters of humanity to reveal a great deal, some things noble, other things not.  I’m thinking it quite likely the Abu Graib incident was a temporary shift that may well have revealed something that normally rides the inversion layer 300 fathoms down as it were.