Sitting in: to
observe what you’re not really a part of, to play with a band not your
own. A lot of things are sitting in when
you get right down to it, in the most technical sense of the thing a whole lot
of modern entertainments qualify. I listened
to a radio show this morning hosted by two ladies who, it would seem, are
members of slightly different facets of the Native American pagan community
speaking out to others whose beliefs don’t descend from the tent of Abraham. The content of their talk covered a variety
of subjects where there might be common ground between them. The soon to arrive solstice commonly marks a
time for celebrations and rituals in many belief structures, it seemed an
appropriate time to sit in as it were and hear what they had to say.
Just for
references sake, I am an ex-patriot Mormon who does not really subscribe to any
of the formalized belief structures but rather simply acknowledge that there is
a consciousness beyond that known to the humans. I am, in simplest terms, simply a deist. There
is an entity known to humanity through the ages as God, a self aware immortal
thought force that intersects with our reality as a single omniscient and consummately
benign being to whom I offer my allegiance in the common cause of survival as
self. Since this entity abides in realms
beyond the limitations I perceive concerning my own thought and perception it
then follows there is a valid possibility for a progression of other points of
that thought force structured in varying degrees of complexity and motive which
may well exist in part or in total beyond the limits of my direct perception. For
me matters of a spiritual nature resolve to an ever more delicate quest to
determine an answer to a most simple, and in that simplicity exceedingly deep,
question: could this be true?
There is no doubt
in my mind that whatever might be revealed concerning the literal and absolute
truth of what exists in the realms of the spirit it is a true statement that humanity uses the thought of the spiritual
as a screen against which it projects its’ perceptions of itself. The personalities seen in the interactions of
the various Gods and Goddesses one with another, one or the other with the
humans, the totems and talismans, the rituals and the ceremonies, all of these
things are clearly of human construction.
They are, to borrow a concept from Dr. Asimov’s awesome work of
imagination The Foundation Trilogy, variables
defined within the algebra of humanity that mankind uses trying to reduce the
equation of self into some meaningful and useful form. I am not belittling these efforts, far from
it. Each system is a branching of
mankind’s efforts to understand, the history of the peoples and cultures who
embrace each such effort a test platform for discerning any truth carried
within that structure, for as it is said several places in the Bible: “By their fruit you will know them...”
No matter the
(meta)physics involved there is a primal polarity involved with all changes to
a life, and for my purposes that is by far the more critical understanding. Regardless of the mechanisms involved all
things show the ethical polarity of motive.
Yes, I did, I just paired the word ethics from the humanities with the
word polarity from the sciences. Sue me,
it’s a valid concept the ladies also touched on in a most interesting, and
actually rather optimistic, manner.
Their approach to
the thought involved the Native American meaning to the word “medicine.” To the world of science medicine is an
external thing brought to bear against some affliction, some disease, while if
I understood correctly (no promises, just best effort) to the Native American
traditions the word “medicine” also includes influencing internal perceptions,
attitudes, designed to effect the psychology of the soul. The concept is fully valid, science is
documenting ever more evidence that the deep levels of psychology, the deep
levels of conflict induced stress do indeed play major to massive roles in the
overall health of an individual. Most
likely the Medicine Man of the old ways actually understood this before the
Medicine Man of the modern had a clue.
Modern medicine is very powerful, and yet the medicine of the old ways
has the potential for it to be needed far less often than is commonly
seen.
What the ladies
said concerning “medicine” is that it will impact health for seven
generations. This factoid of their
beliefs caught my ear, for I’d always associated the number seven to the
generations, to be specific I’d (mis)remembered the Bible verses concerning the
sins of the father would reach out even to seven generations. But no, when I looked up the verses they all
said four generations. I find it a
strange coincidence that my error equaled their belief. That “medicine” in their sense has a seven
generation range while the sins that most likely gave rise to the need for such
medicine are reported as only impacting four?
Hmmm.... an interesting difference, that one is. It implies that at the deepest levels the
wholesome will out endure the profane, and I find that a fine thought indeed.
though i'm atheist when it comes to the god worshipped in differing forms by adherents to the various major, [and minor], religions; and agnostic in wondering if there is indeed a cosmic consciousness or awareness, i am spiritual in being unable to effectively deny that there appears to be a universal connection within our selves, and probably to the universe thru atomic entanglement. both internally and externally, all moments, including the thoughts therein, echo forward within the confines of time. everything... operates within a process of mathematically traceable, in many ways fractally visible, system of laws and patterns. there are two realities, Quantum and Newtonian-Einsteinian.
ReplyDeleteone cannot deny the empirical proof of the placebo effect. i believe i'm living it, continuously.
i personally see, in many instances, that the multiple conflux of, what might be interpreted as mere individual coincidi, becomes numerically outrageous to dismiss as random when the odds of several intercepting simultaneously are considered. of course, this may just be me 'hoping' due to my admitted humanness.
"the arc of the universe is long, and leans toward justice." that, in a nutshell is the game theory explanation of evolution in progress. i think it is valid.
so, there is more to reality than meets the eye. thus, i definitely lean 'spiritual'!
; ) pip
Hmmm...We seem to have three very different viewpoints represented in us who visit, read and comment regularly: Deist, Atheist, and myself as Theist. The main difference between Deism and Theism is that theists usually believe that God, far from being "out there" and not present in our lives, is in fact active and powerful, choosing to let us share in His plan and purposes and actions. The question then becomes, Why don't we see more of Her presence?
ReplyDeleteActually, Jesus gave His disciples much more power over the natural and spirit worlds than we usually remember or realize: "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father." (John 14:12) And the Book of Acts records many of these "greater works." And in fact, there's a lot more of such stuff going on in other countries and certain groups even here in the US that doesn't make the evening news. Yet why don't more of His followers today do such things, or rather let God do them through them?
My sense is that it is the institutionalized Church that has taken away our abilities in the spirit and natural world, by arrogating to itself (itselves?) the authority to control thoughts, words and deeds. Like all big organizations, their first priority is to retain the power lines that exist. So the last thing they need or want is an informed laity who think for themselves and actually tap into the Source of Power to do miracles! Very sad, for otherwise we might already have evoked Heaven on Earth...
Jochanaan, for myself I very much believe that the entity known as "God" is very much here, very up close and personal, that we who experience (for this time at least) mortality exist in a symbiotic relationship of mutual value and love, but that because of the differences in our respective states of being we, the mortal, have a great deal of trouble understanding the fullness of the relationship, we do not fully understand the motives involved. I seem to recall some scripture to that effect, something about "my reasons are not your reasons..." It is why I am adamant in support of full free will, for to my logic anything less becomes a slander on the concept of the Almighty, a projection of the mortal's insecurities and ignorance onto an entity who by definition does not suffer those shortcomings.
DeleteYou'll get no argument from me!
DeleteJochannan, i don't know if i agree with you on "power to do miracles", [that remains in the more unlikely part of my 'as-if' file], but i definitely agree with this - "Like all big organizations, their first priority is to retain the power lines that exist".
ReplyDelete:) pip