Sunday, May 24, 2015

Third Reality of Man Ch 6: Who Mourns Adonis?

The myths and legends concerning deities, the Gods and Goddesses, have been part of the human condition for a very, very long time.  Upon rational inspection these stories, be they fossil remembrances of actual events or simply projections of imagination, are quite often found to be where a people and a culture store the accumulated wisdom of their lives.  The richer mythologies, such as the Greco-Roman or Indian pantheons, clearly reflect these peoples understandings: of themselves, of their times, of humanity in general.  Some deity comes to represent a common trait of humanity, that element of the human condition then set to motivate mythological flesh as a dominant personality trait while some other trait is represented by say that deity’s sister or cousin or consort, the story of the relationships and motivations for those relationship between the two that carry down the generations as legend give the host culture’s understanding of the associated interpersonal dynamics, ultimately the social dynamics,  commonly found along the interface between the traits. 

Even in this age of exponential advancement in the sciences and technology these entities are still power players on the stage of human affairs.  How is it these entities, ancient as they are, still command such power?  From a functional perspective obviously these entities must still provide some needed service to still have value within the lives of those who offer them their fealty.  For all that science can now explain the mechanics of human life with an appreciable degree of fidelity it is obvious science cannot even fully duplicate the true functionality of these entities much less surpass them or they would not remain the powers they are.  To rational observation it is apparent there must be things these entities provide which science simply cannot. 

What do these deities of antiquity provide to humanity that assures their continuance?  What do they provide that science cannot?  A deep question, a very deep question, and yet the answer is not so very hard when the simple minded arrogance of fact  is set aside: they provide a needed service in places where science does not, because it truly cannot, operate: the realms of ethical choice and aesthetic opinion, the issues of self definition and self judgment that exist exclusively within the inner first reality of each individual’s self perception.  The Gods and Goddesses, the realms of the supernatural, exist and persist on the value of a vocabulary pertinent to the most absolutely intimate of things, the matters of heart and soul from which are derived the motives and ambitions, the dreams and the nightmares that power the totality of a life regardless of where or when that life might be lived.

I will assert these thought structures built upon perceptions of the supernatural, evolved and inherited as they are, are evidence of mankind’s oldest involvement with collective entities and those entities’ place in the human condition.  Examined from the perspective of an ongoing effort at self definition all of human history easily becomes  a testament to the effect of some collective entity expanding out of the inner first reality of the host individuals to become a consolidated force vector impacting the common second reality where originates the history of the race.

From antiquity the works of mankind have all, each and every one, shared one trait in common: they ultimately originate from someone’s desire to make the second, external, reality match some specific element of their internal first reality.   Perhaps little commented on, but true.  Any and every change mankind has with deliberation introduced into the environment of life began with a precipitating vision that at some point existed nowhere save in the inner first reality of some one individual’s imagination.  (appended 6/8/15... this thought belongs here, not later)

In all of my wanderings across the landscape of the human I’ve not found a more powerful phenomenon than the one just mentioned: the expansion into the second (common) reality of a collective entity originally evolved to serve the needs of its’ hosts individual and private inner reality.  The story of these migrations across that first and most primal of frontiers is the story of the human race, a full understanding of the motives involved, the alliances formed between the various collectives both inner and outer, the running river of blood and mortality for both host and collective is the story of the human race.  Oh yes, a collective entity can die, it can be killed, the collective entities know war just as do the individuals.

Convoluted and contradictory as the answer might be the question must be asked: what motivates, what could possibly motivate, these migrations whence originate so very many of humanities miseries?  This thought will be continued, and expanded, in the forthcoming chapter “Dancing All Around Me Hat…”

Oh, and just as an IMO footnote?  Who Mourns Adonis?   That’s easy.  He’s mourned by every lesbian lass who from time to time desperately wishes she had his truly divine  beauty to inspire her and give her permission to reach out with her heart open to the other half of the world.


...to be continued...

3 comments:

  1. I confess i'm still not sure whether to take your collective-entity theory with a high degree of literalism; however, it does seem that ideals become driving forces of their own. Certainly the major and many minor religions have become constructs so powerful as to govern the actions of many if not most folks in the world, as have constructs like Love, Sex, Capitalism, Philosophy, and the Trinity... (Even though I believe in the Trinity of God, I still have to recognize it as a human attempt to understand a truth which is so far beyond us that we can only see a little bit during our lives, like the blind philosophers with the elephant.)

    Do these entities rise to the level of angels (including demons who are fallen angels)? I'm not sure we can say...

    Adonis, as a construct or entity, seems to represent (not just for lesbians but for all women and maybe even all men) an ideal of sacrificial young-man-hood. And yes, I can imagine that in their deepest hearts many folks would mourn that the ideal has become so corrupted in "real life." And, contrary to popular opinion, it is possible to mourn for something you've never experienced; such ideals and archetypes are so compelling as to seem part of our core beings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neither do I Jochanaan, neither do I. Know just how literally a rational man should take the idea of a self aware CE. To my thought the evidence is adequate to believe that they are real, well into becoming self aware, but there is a big difference between believing that something is real and actually hosting a full spectrum understanding of that thing, particularly when it clearly exists in a frame of reference that by definition must be (at least partially) one order of dimensional complexity larger than one's own. As I said in the very beginning of this blog, way back in the day, this concept is either a work of insanity, or brilliance, and I myself don’t know which. My only security is in that knowing that since it might be a work of insanity that knowing lessens the chances that it actually is.

      Insanity or otherwise though I’m going to continue the series, because literal or not the CE’s do provide a workable frame of reference from which to analyze and understand the societies of man which are obviously spiraling at an ever increasing rate closer and closer to what can only be called social insanity on the global scale… and only in understanding can the rational hope to survive.

      As always Jochanaan I thank you for your so very well taken points and observations. Semper Fi, bro’.

      Delete
    2. You're welcome. :)

      I tend to think more along the lines of "groupthink" or mob psychology, things which every performing artist (actor, musician, dancer, politician or preacher) understands intuitively if not consciously. Often, a "mob" is a transitory thing, coming together for a single purpose and breaking up when its "work" is done; but sometimes mobs become institutionalized into denominations, companies, clubs and the like. And those who belong to such things very often get to a point where the defense of the organization becomes more important to them than its original work or ideals--the "my country right or wrong" mindset. Then, these "entities" must be judged first on how well or badly they make humans better people and the world a better place...

      Delete